← return to transmissions
> TRANSMISSION 0x0046 // 2024.09.02 // CLASSIFICATION: DEVELOPERTOOLS

AI Coding Assistants for VS Code - A Developer's Comparison

1 MIN/
developertoolssoftwareengineeringtechproductivitygenai

πŸ€– VS Code is my go-to IDE. Experienced with Python, but a recent, smaller project had me venturing into JavaScript, CSS, and HTML. Opportunity to compare some compatible AI coding assistants (which are here to stay)!

πŸ€– + πŸ’» GitHub Copilot
πŸ‘‰ Paid service, costing $10 p/m.
πŸ‘ Tab autocomplete works well, for me the best autocomplete, maintains context well.
πŸ‘Ž Limited to OpenAI's GPT4 and Codex models.

➑️ Cursor
πŸ‘‰ Lots of buzz about Cursor, including from @Andrej Karpathy.
πŸ‘‰ Twice as expensive as Copilot, at $20 p/m for paid tier and access to OpenAI/Anthropic LLM completions. Or free if bringing your own closed provider API keys.
πŸ‘ Slick chat UI.
πŸ‘ IMO not so great maintaining context between questions.
πŸ‘Ž Couldn't get working with self-hosted LLM router.
πŸ‘Ž Looks identical to VS Code, but it's a fork. Don't want to get locked into this.
πŸ‘Ž Tab autocomplete only in paid tier!

⏩ Continue
πŸ‘‰ Maintains same VSCode functionality, it's just an extension.
πŸ‘Full control over model selection for chat text generation/autocomplete/embedding. Bring my own API keys for cloud hosted models, or
πŸ‘Seemlessly integrate self-hosted models!
πŸ‘Good context retention

For now, sticking with Continue, cancelling that GitHub Copilot sub.